Skip navigation

Tag Archives: rasisme

Mine 365 dager som registrert medlem i Det Kongelige Norske Fremskrittsparti avsluttes med denne ferske NTB-meldingen fra København:

København (NTB): Dansk Folkeparti roser SV for å ha åpnet for å forby bruk av hijab i barneskolen.

Superrasistene i Dansk Folkeparti er altså meget fornøyd med Sosialistisk Venstreparti, og parodien er fullkommen. Jeg ser ingen grunn til å tillegge flere argumenter om at det ikke skiller et kvinnelig kjønnshår mellom de ulike etablissementspartiene i norsk politikk. Frp? SV? Samma ulla, spørrumeg.

Jeg vil selvsagt vurdere om jeg skal orke å melde meg ut av partiet, nå som jeg har bevist at det er mulig å være med der et helt år uten å dele dets syn på noe som helst annet enn de øvrige partienes idioti og idiotiske forgrunnspersoner. Men jeg kan strengt tatt like gjerne bli stående der som medlem, det kan være en fin illustrasjon av det fullstendig meningsløse i norsk politikk anno 2010.

Jeg kommer ut av det gangne året med et nytt syn på Fremskrittspartiet. Det er et helt vanlig norsk parti, bare hakket mer profesjonelt, moderne og elektronisk kommuniserende enn de øvrige partiene.

Saken over viser også at Fremskrittspartiet er landets mest effektive og vellykkede politiske parti. De kan åpenbart instruere SV-minister Halvorsen i hijab-saken, eller de har lyktes med å spre sitt rasistiske og menneskefiendtlige budskap til samtlige norske etablerte partier.

Nøyaktig hvordan dette er skjedd er egentlig likegyldig. Nå trenger Norge reelt demokrati.

Ser vi ikke at dette er rasisme? Er det vondt for oss å erkjenne at Norge er en rasistisk stat?

Etter å ha hørt særlig AMK-samtale 7 sitter jeg igjen med følelsen av at det disse menneskene ble utsatt for 3. januar var et overgrep, mer konkret psykologisk tortur. Svinene på AMK – ja, det var en 3-4 støkker, med flere dialekter og både menn og kvinner – lot som de aldri fikk med seg adressen, snakket veldig nedlatende til dem, drøyde lenge med å sende ambulanse ut og fortalte ikke familien om dette, og på grunn av frustrasjonen over at de ikke visste om noen ambulanse var på vei, tok AMK-svinene like godt og tilkalte politiet og lot ambulansen vente i bunnen av bakken i Jens Bjelkes gate.

Hører du svigersønnen som ringer AMK i samtale 7, er det tydelig at han er helt nedbrutt av denne umenneskelige behandlingen. Han er rede til å gå løs på ordensmakten, blir lagt i bakken og brøler JÆVLA PURK. Fuck tha Police!

Knappe tre dager inn i det nye året og den sakte men sikkert eskalerende institusjonelle norske hverdagsrasismen er tilbake i gjenge igjen.

Jeg skammer meg – nok en gang – over å være norsk.

AMK til politiet mens Tulum dør: Det er en svært svært hissig et eller annet. Pakistaner eller noe sånt. Masse skrik. Det er en syk syk mor der. Vi har ikke lyst til å gå inn dit nå. […] Har dere trukket dere ut derfra? Sannsynligvis er dette bare en bagatell.

Hvor mange av dem som jobber på ambulansesentralen AMK har fortid fra Vigrid og/eller Boot Boys?

TV2, TV22, TV23, TV24 (lydlogg som tekst), TV25 (lydlogger), TV26, VG, VG2, Google Nyheter.

Da er lydloggene sluppet fri, og joda, operatørene hos AMK var uproffe på en typisk rasistisk måte da de ikke kunne ta ned adressen kjapt og klargjøre om de sendte en bil eller ikke. Ambulansefolkene var uproffe på en typisk rasistisk måte da de stanset ambulansen underveis til Tulum og tilkalte politiforsterkninger(!) fordi de så noen andre mørkhudede i en bil i samme gate. Og politifolkene var sist, men ikke minst uproffe på en typisk rasistisk måte da de rett og slett lempa svigersønn og datter i snøfonna og satte på dem håndjern fordi de var bekymret for om ambulansen kunne komme frem tidsnok til å redde livet til Døndu Tulum. Men den endelige dommen om hvorvidt dette er rasisme eller ikke er outsourca til Canada, der en dude skal konkludere innen sommeren basert på oversettelser av de to lydloggene. Blame Canada!

Da er det omsider kommet en fullstendig gjengivelse (på engelsk) av talen til Irans president på FNs rasismekonferanse i Geneve nylig. Den kommer selvsagt fra et nettsted i Iran.

Karsten Johansen har de uhyggelige historiske parallellene de Israel-vennlige landenes zionistiske delegaters utmarsj skriver seg inn i:

absurdistan

En historisk sammenligning er her svært interessant: Hvem har historisk benyttet samme linje, som nå USA og denne stats angivelig «demokratiske» lydstater benytter overfor andre stater, som representerer et globalt folkeflertall, stater som hverken er mer eller mindre «demokratiske» eller krigerske enn de boykottende
sjøl, men […] som de boykottende altså prøver å stemple som pariastater ved å delegetimere hele FN?

Svaret på spørsmålet er enkelt: Hitler-Tyskland og Mussolini-Italia. Disse statene utvandret fra og boykottet Folkeforbundet, FNs forløper, på samme historiske grunn: i Geneve, fordi det som dengang var Folkeforbundets flertall, protesterte mot deres (Italias) kolonialistiske okkupasjonspolitikk i Libya, Etiopia mm.

I dag forsvarer, på helt tilsvarende måte som dengang Hitler og Mussolini, nemlig ved boykott av et flertall som forsvarer folkeretten, USA og vasaller Israels kolonialistiske og rasistiske okkupasjonspolitikk.

Parallellen avslører på alle måter det triste og faretruende ved verdenssituasjonen i dag. Det tragiske understrekes ytterligere av, at den okkuperende og rasistiske undertrykkerstaten er grunnlagt og utøver sin brutale framferd presis i navnet av ofrene for trettitallets undertrykker-regimers folkemordspolitikk.

Det er som Blackadder-sitatet jeg deler med alle som kommer til meg og sier de gjerne vil finne ut mer om verden og sette seg bedre inn det som skjer idag: You will be sick immediately!

President Ahmadinejad’s speech at the Durban Review Conference on racism

The following is the speech of the Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at the Durban Review Conference on racism in Geneva on April 20.

Mr. Chairman, honorable secretary general of the United Nations, honorable United Nations high commissioner for human rights, Ladies and gentleman:

We have gathered in the follow-up to the Durban conference against racism and racial discrimination to work out practical mechanisms for our holy and humanitarian campaigns.

Over the last centuries, humanity has gone through great sufferings and pains. In the Medieval Ages, thinkers and scientists were sentenced to death. It was then followed by a period of slavery and slave trade. Innocent people were taken captive in their millions and separated from their families and loved ones to be taken to Europe and America under the worst conditions. A dark period that also experienced occupation, lootings and massacres of innocent people.

Many years passed by before nations rose up and fought for their liberty and freedom and they paid a high price for it. They lost millions of lives to expel the occupiers and establish independent and national governments. However, it did not take long before power grabbers imposed two wars in Europe which also plagued a part of Asia and Africa. Those horrific wars claimed about a hundred million lives and left behind massive devastation. Had lessons been learnt from the occupations, horrors and crimes of those wars, there would have been a ray of hope for the future.

The victorious powers called themselves the conquerors of the world while ignoring or down treading upon rights of other nations by the imposition of oppressive laws and international arrangements.

Ladies and gentlemen, let us take a look at the UN Security Council which is one of the legacies of World War I and World War II. What was the logic behind their granting themselves the veto right? How can such logic comply with humanitarian or spiritual values? Would it not be inconformity with the recognized principles of justice, equality before the law, love and human dignity? Would it not be discrimination, injustice, violations of human rights or humiliation of the majority of nations and countries?

The council is the highest decision-making world body for safeguarding international peace and security. How can we expect the realization of justice and peace when discrimination is legalized and the origin of the law is dominated by coercion and force rather than by justice and the rights?

Coercion and arrogance is the origin of oppression and wars. Although today many proponents of racism condemn racial discrimination in their words and their slogans, a number of powerful countries have been authorized to decide for other nations based on their own interests and at their own discretion and they can easily violate all laws and humanitarian values as they have done so.

Following World War II, they resorted to military aggression to make an entire nation homeless under the pretext of Jewish suffering and they sent migrants from Europe, the United States and other parts of the world in order to establish a totally racist government in occupied Palestine. And, in fact, in compensation for the dire consequences of racism in Europe, they helped bring to power the most cruel and repressive racist regime in Palestine.

The Security Council helped stabilize the occupying regime and supported it in the past 60 years giving them a free hand to commit all sorts of atrocities. It is all the more regrettable that a number of Western governments and the United States have committed themselves to defending those racist perpetrators of genocide while the awakened-conscience and free-minded people of the world condemn aggression, brutalities and the bombardment of civilians in Gaza. The supporters of Israel have always been either supportive or silent against the crimes.

Dear friends, distinguished delegates, ladies and gentlemen. What are the root causes of the US attacks against Iraq or the invasion of Afghanistan?

Was the motive behind the invasion of Iraq anything other than the arrogance of the then US administration and the mounting pressures on the part of the possessors of wealth and power to expand their sphere of influence seeking the interests of giant arms manufacturing companies affecting a noble culture with thousands of years of historical background, eliminating the potential and practical threats of Muslim countries against the Zionist regime or to control and plunder the energy resources of the Iraqi people?

Why, indeed, almost a million people were killed and injured and a few more millions were displaced? Why, indeed, the Iraqi people have suffered enormous losses amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars? And why was billions of dollars imposed on the American people as the result of these military actions? Was not the military action against Iraq planned by the Zionists and their allies in the then US administration in complicity with the arms manufacturing countries and the possessors of wealth? Did the invasion of Afghanistan restore peace, security and economic wellbeing in the country?

The United States and its allies not only have failed to contain the production of drugs in Afghanistan, but the cultivation of narcotics has multiplied in the course of their presence. The basic question is that what was the responsibility and the job of the then US administration and its allies?

Did they represent the countries of the world? Have they been mandated by them? Have they been authorized by the people of the world to interfere in all parts of the globe, of course mostly in our region? Are not these measures a clear example of egocentrism, racism, discrimination or infringement upon the dignity and independence of nations?

Ladies and gentlemen, who is responsible for the current global economic crisis? Where did the crisis start from? From Africa, Asia or from the United States in the first place then spreading across Europe and their allies?

For a long time, they imposed inequitable economic regulations by their political power on the international economy. They imposed a financial and monetary system without a proper international oversight mechanism on nations and governments that played no role in repressive trends or policies. They have not even allowed their people to oversea or monitor their financial policies. They introduced all laws and regulations in defiance of all moral values only to protect the interests of the possessors of wealth and power.

They further presented a definition for market economy and competition that denied many of the economic opportunities that could be available to other countries of the world. They even transferred their problems to others while the waves of crisis lashed back plaguing their economies with thousands of billions of dollars in budget deficit. And today, they are injecting hundreds of billions of dollars of cash from the pockets of their own people and other nations into the failing banks, companies and financial institutions making the situation more and more complicated for their economy and their people. They are simply thinking about maintaining power and wealth. They could not care any less about the people of the world and even their own people.

Mr. President, Ladies and gentlemen, Racism is rooted in the lack of knowledge concerning the root of human existence as the selected creature of God. It is also the product of his deviation from the true path of human life and the obligations of mankind in the world of creation, failing to consciously worship God, not being able to think about the philosophy of life or the path to perfection that are the main ingredients of divine and humanitarian values which have restricted the horizon of human outlook making transient and limited interests, the yardstick for his action. That is why evil’s power took shape and expanded its realm of power while depriving others from enjoying equitable and just opportunities of development.

The result has been the making of an unbridled racism that is posing the most serious threats against international peace and has hindered the way for building peaceful coexistence in the entire world. Undoubtedly, racism is the symbol of ignorance which has deep roots in history and it is, indeed, the sign of frustration in the development of human society.

It is, therefore, crucially important to trace the manifestations of racism in situations or in societies where ignorance or lack of knowledge prevails. This increasing general awareness and understanding towards the philosophy of human existence is the principle struggle against such manifestations, and reveals the truth that human kind centers on the creation of the universe and the key to solving the problem of racism is a return to spiritual and moral values and finally the inclination to worship God Almighty.

The international community must initiate collective moves to raise awareness in afflicted societies where ignorance of racism still prevails so as to bring to a halt the spread of these malicious manifestations.

Dear Friends, today, the human community is facing a kind of racism which has tarnished the image of humanity in the beginning of the third millennium.

World Zionism personifies racism that falsely resorts to religions and abuses religious sentiments to hide its hatred and ugly face. However, it is of great importance to bring into focus the political goals of some of the world powers and those who control huge economic resources and interests in the world. They mobilize all the resources including their economic and political influence and world media to render support in vain to the Zionist regime and to maliciously diminish the indignity and disgrace of this regime.

This is not simply a question of ignorance and one cannot conclude these ugly phenomena through consular campaigns. Efforts must be made to put an end to the abuse by Zionists and their political and international supporters and in respect with the will and aspirations of nations. Governments must be encouraged and supported in their fights aimed at eradicating this barbaric racism and to move towards reform in current international mechanisms.

There is no doubt that you are all aware of the conspiracies of some powers and Zionist circles against the goals and objectives of this conference. Unfortunately, there have been literatures and statements in support of Zionists and their crimes. And it is the responsibility of honorable representatives of nations to disclose these campaigns which run counter to humanitarian values and principles.

It should be recognized that boycotting such a session as an outstanding international capacity is a true indication of supporting the blatant example of racism. In defending human rights, it is primarily important to defend the rights of all nations to participate equally in all important international decision making processes without the influence of certain world powers.

And secondly, it is necessary to restructure the existing international organizations and their respective arrangements. Therefore this conference is a testing ground and the world public opinion today and tomorrow will judge our decisions and our actions.

Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen, the world is going through rapid fundamental changes. Power relations have become weak and fragile. The sound of cracks in the pillars of world systems can now be heard. Major political and economic structures are on the brink of collapse. Political and security crises are on the rise. The worsening crisis in the world economy for which there can be seen no bright prospect, demonstrates the rising tide of far-reaching global changes. I have repeatedly emphasized the need to change the wrong direction through which the world is being managed today and I have also warned of the dire consequences of any delay in this crucial responsibility.

Now in this valuable event, I would like to announce to all leaders, thinkers and to all nations of the world present in this meeting and those who have a hunger for peace and economic well-being that the unjust economic management of the world is now at the end of the road. This deadlock was inevitable since the logic of this imposed management was oppressive.

The logic of collective management of world affairs is based on noble aspirations which centers on human beings and the supremacy of the almighty God. Therefore it defies any policy or plan which goes against the influence of nations. The victory of right over wrong and the establishment of a just world system has been promised by the Almighty God and his messengers and it has been a shared goal of all human beings from different societies and generations in the course of history. Realization of such a future depends on the knowledge of creation and the belief of the faithful.

The making of a global society is in fact the accomplishment of a noble goal held in the establishment of a common global system that will be run with the participation of all nations of the world in all major decision making processes and the definite root to this sublime goal.

Scientific and technical capacities as well as communication technology have created a common and widespread understanding of the world society and has provided the necessary ground for a common system. Now it is upon all intellectuals, thinkers and policy makers in the world to carry out their historical responsibility with a firm belief in this definite root.

I also want to lay emphasis on the fact that Western liberalism and capitalism has reached its end since it has failed to perceive the truth of the world and humans as they are.

It has imposed its own goals and directions on human beings. There is no regard for human and divine values, justice, freedom, love and brotherhood and it has based living on intense competition, securing individual and cooperative material interest.

Now we must learn from the past by initiating collective efforts in dealing with present challenges and in this connection, and as a closing remark, I wish to draw your kind attention to two important issues:

Firstly, it is absolutely possible to improve the existing situation in the world. However it must be noted that this could be only achieved through the cooperation of all countries in order to get the best out of the existing capacities and resources in the world. My participation in this conference is because of my conviction to these important issues as well as to our common responsibility of defending the rights of nations vis-à-vis the sinister phenomena of racism and being with you, the thinkers of the world.

Secondly, mindful of the inefficiency of the current international political, economic and security systems, it is necessary to focus on divine and humanitarian values by referring to the true definition of human beings based upon justice and respect for the rights of all people in all parts of the world and by acknowledging the past wrong doings in the past dominant management of the world, and to undertake collective measures to reform the existing structures.

In this respect, it is crucially important to rapidly reform the structure of the Security Council, including the elimination of the discriminatory veto right and to change the current world financial and monetary systems.

It is evident that lack of understanding of the urgency for change is equivalent to the much heavier costs of delay.

Dear Friends, beware that to move in the direction of justice and human dignity is like a rapid flow in the current of a river. Let us not forget the essence of love and affection. The promised future of human beings is a great asset that may serve our purposes in keeping together to build a new world.

In order to make the world a better place full of love and blessings, a world devoid of poverty and hatred, merging the increasing blessings of God Almighty and the righteous managing of the perfect human being, let us all join hands in friendship in the fulfillment of such a new world.

I thank you Mr. President, Secretary General and all distinguished participants for having the patience to listen to me. Thank you very much.

Arbeiderpartiets valgkampkontor: På bare 45 minutters varsel kan muslimene overta generalsekretær Jaap de Hoop Scheffers stilling, og admiral Giampaolo di Paolas stilling som styreleder for NATOs militærkomité, kort sagt alle de sentrale posisjonene i den transantlantiske forsvarsalliansen.

Det er koordinator for Arbeiderpartiets valgkamp-einsatzgruppe, Martin Kolberg, som kommer med denne sjokkerende brannfakkelen i en NTB-melding. Arbeiderpartiet vil derfor knuse radikal islam, som han sier.

Vi i Fremskrittspartiet tar denne såkalte brannfakkelen fra Kolberg med knusende ro, som det paniske forsøket det er på å kapre noen av våre rasiststemmer. Vi mener også å kunne bevise at Kolberg har forregnet seg: Det vil ta minst halvannen time for muslimene å vinne kontroll over en så stor og mektig militærallianse som NATO.

Det er selvsagt en ren tilfeldighet at Aps 45-minuttersutspill kommer samme dag som gallupen viser 8,5 prosentpoengs fremgang for Fremskrittspartiet.

Hans Rustad driver den ekle lille fremmedfiendtlige bloggen Document.no, der han sammen med likesinnede tilsynelatende er livredd for alt som lukter av religionsfrihet.

Utgangspunktet er denne gang et foredrag den norskspråklige imamen Madni holdt i regi av foreningen IslamNet på Bislet 8. mai i fjor. Dette foredraget ble først 24. februar i år omtalt i norske massemedier, altså 9 måneder og 16 dager etter HiO-forelesningen. Vi får anta at TV2 har sine gode – om enn aldri så uransakelige – grunner for timingen av oppslaget.

Dette predikes på norsk, og det i seg selv er en sterk opplevelse, og det forkynnes fra et kateter på Høgskolen i Oslo. I auditoriet sitter mange unge muslimer – kvinner og menn. De lytter med oppmerksomhet. Dette er det de blir foret med på en offentlig høgskole – på selveste frigjøringsdagen.

Grepet med å blande inn at det var 8. mai, frigjøringsdagen fra 1945, har Rustad bare lånt fra TV2, som åpenbart selv mener det er skremmende og riv, ruskende galt at en religiøs studentforening kan få arrangere en gjesteforelesning på en torsdag i mai.

Rustad hisser opp både seg selv og sine vel så rabiate sidekicks over dette, og velger seg artikkeloverskriften «Diktatur på norsk». Intet mindre.

Det har åpenbart ikke slått rasisten Rustad at frigjøringsdagen i 1945 var en frigjøring fra fascisme og religiøs og kulturell ensretting. At det var en frigjøring fra forfølgelse og deportasjon av jøder, homofile, sosialister og intellektuelle.

At man i den norske religionsfrihetens navn kan få bruke en vanlig hverdag i mai – som her tilfeldigvis også er frigjøringsdagen – til å holde en forelesning om islam og 9/11 er med andre ord i sin skjønneste orden og en logisk konsekvens av frigjøringen fra fascismen (i Rustads sinn er jo Norge idag et fritt land som kan gjøre som det vil).

Hans Rustad er med andre ord sprøyte gal. I alle fall er den demagogiske retorikken hans det.

Og mainstreammedia på sin side? 290 dagers reaksjonstid på en forelesning er jo påfallende mye, men det er kanskje mer forståelig at TV2 og NTB (og med NTB alle landets aviser) sparte oppslaget til februar 2009, når man ser det i sammenheng med Fremskrittspartiets valgkamp og lanseringen av fører Jensens nye gardiner?

Vi merker oss altså at massemediene kun er interessert i 9/11-skepsis når de kan trekke inn skjeggete imamer eller kvisete DJ-jyplinger som vel egentlig jobber for den andre siden. I norske medier eksisterer slett ikke 9/11 Truth Norge, heller ikke den originale amerikanske 9/11 Truth-bevegelsen, med sine Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, Muslims, Jews & Christians for 9/11 Truth og so bortetter. Det er bare muslimer (og DJer) som er opptatt av dette, og det er farlig islamistisk ekstremisme å si at USA sto bak 9/11, og PST må selvsagt passe enda bedre på disse skumle muslimene nå.

Vi lever i et sykt, sykt samfunn.

What is The Matrix?